The return-to-office (RTO) battle has been intense for years now, with companies pushing for in-person work while employees resist, clutching to the flexibility they’ve grown so fond of. Big names like Amazon, Google, and Disney have all implemented RTO mandates, with varying degrees of success…and controversy. (Wall Street Journal)

For some employers, the push is about productivity, collaboration, and maintaining company culture. (Harvard Business Review) For workers, however, it often feels like an arbitrary power play, especially when data suggests that remote and hybrid models don’t necessarily harm performance. (Gallup)

But beneath the surface, RTO isn’t just a debate about where work gets done. Some believe it’s a subtle layoff strategy. (Business Insider) Others see it as a catalyst for new forms of performative workplace behaviours.(Forbes) The question remains: is anyone really winning this war?

The Great RTO Debate: Control vs. Flexibility

The conversation around RTO is deeply dividing and often controversial. On one side, companies argue that returning to the office fosters better teamwork, spontaneous innovation, and a stronger sense of belonging. (Harvard Business Review) Some leaders even claim that in-person work boosts productivity and mentorship. (Gallup)

However, employees are pushing back, with surveys showing that nearly 50% of workers say they’d consider quitting if forced into full-time office work. (Pew Research Center) Many argue that remote work has proven effective, offering better work-life balance and eliminating unproductive commutes. Employees aren’t just rejecting RTO out of laziness, they’re resisting a model that doesn’t fit modern work dynamics. (Harvard Business Review)

Yet, some companies have doubled down, enforcing stricter RTO policies. The question is: why?

Is RTO a Quiet Layoff Strategy?

Beyond the usual arguments, some suspect RTO is being used as a covert layoff mechanism. By mandating in-office work, companies may be pushing employees to quit voluntarily, effectively reducing headcount without the PR nightmare of mass layoffs. (Business Insider)

This theory isn’t baseless. Some firms have implemented RTO policies only to later announce layoffs, suggesting a strategic manoeuvre to shrink workforces without severance packages or bad press. (Wall Street Journal) Employees who can’t relocate or refuse to return are left with little choice but to resign. (Forbes)

But here’s the catch: while this strategy might trim the workforce, it often backfires by driving away top talent. High performers, who often have better job prospects elsewhere, are the first to leave, while less adaptable employees may stay, leading to a net loss in productivity and innovation.

So, in this particular battle, companies might win the short-term cost-cutting war but lose the long-term talent game.

Coffee Badging: A Subtle Rebellion or a Tantrum?

In response to rigid RTO policies, employees are finding creative ways to comply, without embracing in-office work. Enter coffee badging: the act of showing up at the office just long enough to be seen (and swipe in with a keycard) before heading elsewhere to actually work. (Forbes)

Coffee badging is a subtle form of resistance, and while it may seem like a simple act of defiance, it reveals a deeper issue within the modern workplace. (Harvard Business Review) It’s not just about “getting back at the system”; it’s a form of signalling to employers that the one-size-fits-all approach to work isn’t working. Employees are often still willing to engage with the physical office when it fits their personal needs, but only to the extent that they can maintain their desired level of flexibility and autonomy.

Is coffee badging a “tantrum” or a well-placed protest? On the surface, it may seem childish, but in reality, it’s a calculated move. Workers are sending a message to their employers: “We can comply with the action of the mandate, but we will not be fully invested in the spirit of it.”

This behaviour also speaks to a larger cultural shift where employees are reclaiming their autonomy, refusing to be passive participants in rigid systems that don’t serve them. It’s a form of passive resistance, where employees don’t necessarily want to be absent, but they’re unwilling to give up the benefits of flexibility.

The rise of coffee badging also has implications for workplace culture. When employees feel that they must engage in performative behaviours to meet expectations, trust begins to erode. Instead of a collaborative, motivating environment, companies risk fostering a culture of compliance over commitment.

What does this mean for organisations? If employees are finding ways to comply while avoiding true engagement, companies may face a major disconnect. Employees aren’t necessarily rejecting work; they’re rejecting the specific, outdated framework being imposed. In the long run, the question becomes: are employees more productive when they have autonomy over their work environment, or does enforced presence truly lead to better results?

So… Who’s Winning the RTO War?

At first glance, it might seem like employers are winning. They hold the power to enforce policies, and employees are, for the most part, complying. (Wall Street Journal) But if compliance comes in the form of performative presence rather than actual engagement, what’s really being achieved?

Top talent is walking away. Employee trust is eroding. Rather than building stronger workplaces, RTO mandates may be fostering workplace theatre instead of real productivity. (Harvard Business Review)

The real winners? The companies that embrace flexibility and focus on outcomes over optics. Those who strike a balance between in-office and remote work, prioritise trust, and create meaningful engagement will be the ones who will become the strongest.

We love to hear from you! To discuss this topic or see how we can support you with your companies’  future of the work and workplace needs, we invite you to get in contact with us at [email protected]

References

• Harvard Business Review. (2023). Hybrid Work and the Future of Organizational Culture. Harvard Business Review.
• Gallup. (2023). State of the Global Workplace Report. Gallup Research.
• Forbes. (2023). The Rise of Coffee Badging: Symbolic Compliance in the Modern Workplace. Forbes.